Review

Effects of Van Hiele’s Phase-based Teaching Strategy and Gender on Retention of Achievement in Geometry among Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ in Niger State, Nigeria

Hassan Usman 1 * , Wun Thiam Yew 2 , Salmiza Saleh 2
More Detail
1 Niger State College of Education, Minna, NIGERIA2 School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, MALAYSIA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), 2020, ep2009, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/9139
OPEN ACCESS   1228 Views   994 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of Van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy on retention of achievement among pre-service mathematics teachers in Niger State, Nigeria. It also examined the influence of gender and interaction effects of teaching method and gender on retention of achievement. The study adopts a two-by-two (2X2) pretest posttest quasi experimental factorial design. 149 pre-service mathematics teachers from two colleges of education in Niger State were purposively selected for the study. Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) was used for data collection. The reliability coefficient of 0.78 was obtained using Cronbach alpha. GAT was administered to pre-service mathematics teachers as pretest, posttest and retention test. The pre-service mathematics teachers’ retention test scores were analysed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The results indicated that the pre-service mathematics teachers’ taught geometry using van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy retained significantly what was taught better in retention test than their counterparts taught geometry using conventional teaching strategy. However, there was no significant difference reported in the retention test performance scores based on gender and interaction effect. It was however suggested that since the treatment (van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy) were found to be effective in enhancing pre-service teachers’ retention of achievement, it should therefore be use by lecturers in teaching not only geometry but mathematics in general.
This study investigated the effects of Van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy on retention of achievement among pre-service mathematics teachers in Niger State, Nigeria. It also examined the influence of gender and interaction effects of teaching method and gender on retention of achievement. The study adopts a two-by-two (2X2) pretest posttest quasi experimental factorial design. 149 pre-service mathematics teachers from two colleges of education in Niger State were purposively selected for the study. Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) was used for data collection. The reliability coefficient of 0.78 was obtained using Cronbach alpha. GAT was administered to pre-service mathematics teachers as pretest, posttest and retention test. The pre-service mathematics teachers’ retention test scores were analysed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The results indicated that the pre-service mathematics teachers’ taught geometry using van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy retained significantly what was taught better in retention test than their counterparts taught geometry using conventional teaching strategy. However, there was no significant difference reported in the retention test performance scores based on gender and interaction effect. It was however suggested that since the treatment (van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy) were found to be effective in enhancing pre-service teachers’ retention of achievement, it should therefore be use by lecturers in teaching not only geometry but mathematics in general.
Keywords: geometry, gender, pre-service mathematics teachers, retention, Van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy

CITATION (APA)

Usman, H., Yew, W. T., & Saleh, S. (2020). Effects of Van Hiele’s Phase-based Teaching Strategy and Gender on Retention of Achievement in Geometry among Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), ep2009. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/9139

REFERENCES

  1. Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van Hiele’s phase-based instruction using the geometer’s sketchpad (GSP) on students’ levels of geometric thinking. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 1652-1660. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4919
  2. Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Hock, T. T. (2012). Assisting primary school children to progress through their van Hiele’s levels of geometry thinking using Google SketchUp. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.010
  3. Adeniji, S. M., Ameen, S. K., Dambatta, B. U., & Orilonise, R. (2018). Effect of mastery learning approach on senior school students’ academic performance and retention in circle geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 951-962. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11460a
  4. Agwagah, U. N. V. (1994). Effect of instruction in mathematics reading on pupils’ achievement and retention in mathematics education. Journal of Quality Education, 1(1), 67-72.
  5. Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2012). A survey of South African grade 10 learners’ geometric thinking levels in terms of the van Hiele theory. Anthropologist, 14(2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2012.11891229
  6. Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2016). Lessons learnt from employing van Hiele theory-based instruction in senior secondary school geometry classrooms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2223-2236. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1228a
  7. Aliustaoğlu, R. A. F., & Tuna, A. (2018). The influence of 4MAT model on academic achievement and retention of learning in transformation geometry. International Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications (IJONTE), 9(2), 16-32.
  8. Asante, K. O. (2012). Secondary students’ attitudes towards mathematics. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 20(1), 121-133.
  9. Atebe, H. U. (2008). Student’s van Hiele levels of geometric thought and conception in plane geometry: a collective case study of Nigeria and South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Rhodes University, South Africa.
  10. Baffoe, E., & Mmereku, D. K. (2010). The van Hiele levels of understanding of students entering senior high school in Ghana. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Science, 8, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v8i1.69103
  11. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296
  12. Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.17.1.0031
  13. Cannizzaro, L., & Menghini, M. (2006). From geometrical figures to definitional Rigour: Teachers’ analysis of teaching units mediated through van Hiele’s theory. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 6(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556711
  14. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Lin, S. Y. (2007). Developing geometry thinking through multimedia learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2212-2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.007
  15. Chew, C. M. (2007). Form one students’ learning of solid geometry in a phase-based instructional environment using The Geometer’s Sketchpad (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia.
  16. Chew, C. M. (2009). Assessing pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ geometric thinking. Proceedings of the 5th Asian Mathematical Conference Penang, Malaysia.
  17. Chew, C. M., & Lim, C. S. (2013). Enhancing primary pupils’ geometric thinking through phase-based instruction using the geometer’s sketchpad. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education (formerly known as Journal of Educators and Education), 28(1), 1-19.
  18. Choi-Koh, S. S. (2000). The activities based on van Hiele model using computer as a tool. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 4(2), 63-77.
  19. Erdoğan, T., & Durmuş, S. (2009). The effect of the instruction based on Van Hiele model on the geometrical thinking levels of preservice elementary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.029
  20. Eshun, B. (2004). Sex-differences in attitude of students towards mathematics in secondary schools. Mathematics Connection, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4314/mc.v4i1.21495
  21. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 3, i-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/749957
  22. Gambari, A. I., Falode, C. O., & Adegbenro, D. A. (2014). Effectiveness of computer animation and geometrical instructional model on mathematics achievement and retention among junior secondary school students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 127-146.
  23. Haghighi, M. (2013). The effect of brain-based learning on iranian efl learners’ achievement and retention. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 508-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.088
  24. Halat, E. (2008). In-service middle and high school mathematics teachers: Geometric reasoning stages and gender. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 8-14.9
  25. Hassan, A. A. (2015). Effect of van Hiele’s geometric model on pedagogical abilities of nigeria certificate in education mathematics students in Niger state (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.
  26. Hoffer, A. (1983). Van Hiele-based research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.) Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 205-227). New York: Academic Press
  27. Iji, C. O., & Harbour-Peters, V. F. (2005). Effects of logo and basic programs on the achievement in geometry of junior secondary school students. ABACUS, 30(1), 28-40.
  28. Khurana, M. S. (2018). An experimental study of the effect of hands-on activities in mathematics in relation to achievement and concept retention of vii standard students in government schools of Delhi. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 6(11).
  29. Kurumeh, M. S., Onah, F. O., & Mohammed, A. S. (2012). Improving students ‘retention in junior secondary school statistics using the ethno-mathematics teaching approach in Obi and Oju Local Government Areas of Benue State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Educational research, 2(3), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJER.2012.3.10051286
  30. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276
  31. Makinde, S. O., & Yusuf, M. O. (2018). The flipped classroom: its effects on students’ performance and retention in secondary school mathematics classroom. International Journal for Innovative Technology Integration in Education, 1(1), 117-126.
  32. Mata, M. D. L., Monteiro, V., & Peixoto, F. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child development research, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/876028
  33. Mohamed, L., & Waheed, H. (2012). Secondary students’ attitude towards mathematics in a selected school of Maldives. International Journal of humanities and social science, 1(15), 277-281.
  34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Restoh, VA.: NCTM.
  35. Obi, C. N., Agwagah, U. N. V., & Agah, J. J. (2014). Effect of origami on students’ retention in geometry. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 4(5), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04514650
  36. Omenka, J. E (2010). Effect of ethnomathematics approach on Achievement and Attitude towards number and numeration among the junior secondary school students (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Benue state University, Makurdi.
  37. Osemwinyen, A. C. (2009). Effects of e-learning on retention and achievement in secondary school mathematics in Abuja, Nigeria (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  38. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Retrieved from http://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335208908.pdf
  39. Udousoro, U. J. (2002). The relative effects of computer and text-assisted programmed instruction on students’ learning outcomes in mathematics (Unpublished doctoral thesis), University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  40. Usiskin, Z. (1982). van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. (Final Report of the Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project) Chicago: University of Chicago (ERIC Document Reproduction service Number ED220288).
  41. Uygun, N., & Tertemiz, N. I. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning on student attitudes, achievement and retention of learning in math course. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(174). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.1975
  42. Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: a theory of mathematics education. Academic Pres. Inc: Orlando, Florida.
  43. Wells, C. S., & Wollack, J. A. (2003). An instructor’s guide to understanding test reliability. Madison, WI: Testing and Evaluation Service, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Retrieved from http://testing.wisc.edu/Reliability.pdf
  44. Yunus, M., Suraya, A., Ayub, M., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Geometric Thinking of Malaysian Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1095-1112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12170a