Research Article

Using X as an adjunct to LMS in tertiary language learning

Evriklea Dogoriti 1 * , Stefanos Vlachopoulos 1 , Naoum Mylonas 1
More Detail
1 Ionian University, Corfu, GREECE* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(2), 2026, e2614, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/18953
Submitted: 26 February 2026, Published: 13 July 2026
OPEN ACCESS   11 Views   8 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The use of social media in language education is controversial, as research has yet to explicitly demonstrate whether such tools promote language learning or identify a precise mechanism by which they do so. The current study examines the effectiveness of using a social networking system (SNS) in conjunction with a learning management system (LMS). In other words, this study investigates whether SNS can supplement and enhance the use of the current university LMS for formal e-learning in language education. Furthermore, the paper discusses the role of LMSs as learning tools in tertiary foreign language education. It provides an in-depth analysis of the potential of SNS as an educational tool for learner interaction and engagement. Two convenience samples of university students enrolled in an information and communications technology course in the faculty of foreign languages engaged with an SNS integrated into their curriculum to evaluate its impact on learning. The study employed a quantitative comparative design based on questionnaire data and statistical comparisons of academic performance indicators related to the use of Moodle and X in language learning activities. Some aspects investigated were frequency of use, engagement, motivation, sharing, collaboration, and communication in the educational process. The findings establish a synergy between social networking and education and highlight the benefits of using it alongside other teaching tools, such as an LMS, particularly in promoting perceived levels of participation, learner engagement, and communication in tertiary language learning environments.
Keywords: learning management system, social media, online learning, language learning, learner engagement

CITATION (APA)

Dogoriti, E., Vlachopoulos, S., & Mylonas, N. (2026). Using X as an adjunct to LMS in tertiary language learning. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(2), e2614. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/18953

REFERENCES

  1. Adnan, M. (2018). Professional development in the transition to online teaching: The voice of entrant online instructors. ReCALL, 30(1), 88-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000106
  2. Al-Dheleai, Y. M., & Tasir, Z. (2019). Web 2.0 fostering students’ social presence in online learning-based interaction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.552
  3. Avcı, Ü., & Ergün, E. (2022). Online students’ LMS activities and their effect on engagement, information literacy, and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636088
  4. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
  5. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  6. Conole, G. (2021). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Principles and practices of design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351252805
  7. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C. Heath. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
  8. Diep, A. N., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., & Blieck, Y. (2017). Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12431
  9. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Ablex.
  10. Lewis, T. (2011). Teaching academic and professional English online, editors: Isabel González-Pueyo, Carmen Foz Gil, Mercedes Jaime Siso, and María José Luzón Marco. Teaching academic and professional English online Peter Lang, 2009 228 pages 42.50 euros (plus VAT, where payable) ISBN: 978-3-03911-582-2. ReCALL, 23(1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000297
  11. Livingstone, S., & Pothong, K. (2022). Beyond screen time: Rethinking children’s play in a digital world. Journal of Health Visiting, 10(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2022.10.1.32
  12. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653450_017
  13. Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018
  14. Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centered ecologies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854754
  15. Mason, R. (1998). Models of online courses. ALN Magazine, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203278390
  16. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing.
  17. Muali, C., & Karlina, L. (2025). The effect of microlearning integration in digital platforms on student engagement: An experimental study in higher education. Journal of Education Technology, 9(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v9i1.92613
  18. Pérez, E., Manca, S., Fernández-Pascual, R., & Mcguckin, C. (2023). A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11921-11950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11647-2
  19. Prawatmuang, P. (2021). Moodle as a learning management system for language teaching and learning: A review of current practices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(6), 45-59.
  20. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
  21. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.
  22. Tokareva, E. A., Smirnova, Y. V., & Orchakova, L. G. (2019). Innovation and communication technologies: Analysis of the effectiveness of their use and implementation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3219-3234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09922-2
  23. Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Issues in learning management systems implementation: A comparison of research perspectives between Australia and China. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3789-3810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10431-4
  24. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
  25. Väätäjä, J. O., & Ruokamo, H. (2021). Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15(1), Article 1834490921995395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395
  26. Van Den Beemt, A., Thurlings, M., & Willems, M. (2020). Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  28. Windham, C. (2005). The student’s perspective. In D. Oblinger, & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 5.1-5.16). EDUCAUSE.