Research Article

Strategizing Learner Support to Scaffold Learning and Internal Efficiency in Distance Training Program for In-Service Secondary School Teachers in Rwanda

Irénée Ndayambaje 1 , John Aluko Orodho 2 , Norbert Ogeta 2 , Kizito Ndihokubwayo 3 *
More Detail
1 School of Education, University of Rwanda-College of Education, Kayonza, RWANDA2 School of Education, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, KENYA3 African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science, University of Rwanda-College of Education, Kayonza, RWANDA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 4(2), July 2022, ep2207, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12104
Submitted: 18 January 2022, Published: 22 May 2022
OPEN ACCESS   2000 Views   1136 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

While distance training program (DTP) was adopted to increase the rate of qualified in-service teachers in Rwandan secondary schools and upgrade their pedagogical skills, ensuring adequate learner support under this program has remained cumbersome. This paper was an attempt to explore the provision of learner support in DTP and examine how learner support can be strategized to scaffold learning and internal efficiency. The study was conducted in the academic year 2015/2016 and adopted the explanatory sequential mixed-method research design. From a target population of 1,346, stratified random and purposive sampling techniques enabled to arrive a sample 315 respondents. The findings revealed that DTP students lack adequate exposure to learning resources. The schedule of DTP activities is volatile; the staff required to assist students are either insufficient or not recruited in good time. Also, the management of DTP is obstructed by the lack of fully-owned study centers. Hence, in view of the fact that learner support is a contributing factor towards effective learning and holds a statistically positive relationship with internal efficiency, the present study suggests that the highlighted weaknesses in DTP learner support be urgently fixed. In this vein, the management of DTP is recommended to revamp its learner support system by increasing students’ access to enough and varied learning resources, hiring and training personnel in charge of students’ support, and establishing fully owned and equipped study centers across the country.
Keywords: distance education, learner support, scaffolding learning, internal efficiency, Rwanda

CITATION (APA)

Ndayambaje, I., Orodho, J. A., Ogeta, N., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2022). Strategizing Learner Support to Scaffold Learning and Internal Efficiency in Distance Training Program for In-Service Secondary School Teachers in Rwanda. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 4(2), ep2207. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12104

REFERENCES

  1. Akinsolu, A. O. (2012). Resource utilization and internal efficiency in Nigerian secondary schools: Implications for socio problems of education. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 4(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSA11.035
  2. Amin, M. E. (2005). Social science research: Conception, methodology and analysis. Makerere University Press.
  3. Bamberger, M. (2012). Introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation. Impact evaluation notes. The Rockefeller Foundation.
  4. Baruah, T. D. (2011). Improving student promotion through technology in India. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 15-25.
  5. Blackmum, E. V., & Thibodeau, P. P. (2008). Learning communities. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance and online learning environments (pp. 145-156). BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
  6. Cornali, F. (2012). Effectiveness and efficiency of educational measures: Evaluation practices, indicators and rhetoric. Scientific Research, 2(3), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2012.23034
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
  10. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  11. George, L., & Frank, I. (2008). Beyond books-library services to distance education learners. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance and online learning environments (pp. 135-143). BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
  12. Gil, J. I. (2014). Student support services in open and distance education. Open Praxis, 6(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.111
  13. Hafashimana, J. D. (2015). Factors that influence students drop out in distance training programme. Case study of UR-CE [Unpublished masters’ thesis]. University of Rwanda-College of Education.
  14. Hussain, S., & Saeed, M. (2012). Comparative evaluation of the internal efficiency of teacher education institutions in Pakistan. International Researcher, 1(4), 76-88.
  15. Keast, D. A. (1997). Toward an effective model for implementing distance education programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526960
  16. KIE. (2003). Distance training programme: Programme guide. Kigali Institute of Education.
  17. KIE. (2012). Statistics of students and graduands under DTP. Kigali Institute of Education.
  18. Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The role of the academic library in promoting learner engagement in learning. College and Research Libraries, 64(4), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.4.256
  19. Mukamusoni, D. (2006). Distance learning program for teachers at the Kigali Institute of Education: An expository study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v7i2.301
  20. Musobo, I. C., & Gaga, J. (2012). Restructuring TVET as part of the educational reforms in Rwanda, A case on public private partnership in Rwandan TVET. Association for the Development of Education in Africa. http://clearinghouse.adeanet.org/en/restructuring-tvet-part-educational-reforms-rwanda-case-public-private-partnership-rwandan-tvet
  21. Naidu, S. (2008). Supporting learning with creative instructional design. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance and online learning environments (pp. 109-116). BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
  22. Ndayambaje, I. (2016). Influence of learner support on internal efficiency of distance training programme for in-service secondary school teachers, Rwanda [PhD dissertation, Kenyatta University].
  23. Ndayambaje, I., Bimenyimana, V., & Ndahayo, V. (2013). A study on the practices and challenges of distance training programme (DTP) under Kigali Institute of Education (KIE). Rwanda Journal of Education, 1(2), 69-76
  24. Orodho, J. A. (2009). Elements of education and social science research methods. Kenezja Publishers.
  25. Orodho, J. A. (2017). Elements of education and social science research methods. Kanezja Publishers.
  26. Orodho, J. A., Nzabalirwa, W., Odundo, J. Waweru, P. N., & Ndayambaje, I. (2016). Quantitative and qualitative research methods: A step by step guide to scholarly excellence. Kanezja Publishers.
  27. Potter, J. (1998). Beyond access: Learner perspectives on support service needs in distance education. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 24(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.21225/D5R88Q
  28. Ryan, Y. (2008). Pushing the boundaries with online learner support. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance and online learning environments (pp. 125-134). BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
  29. Sammons, P. (2005). Ethical issues and statistical work. In R. G. Burgess (Ed), The ethics of educational research. Social research and educational studies series: 8. The Falmer Press.
  30. Tait, A. (2003). Reflections on learner support in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.134
  31. Umumararungu, C. (2014). Investigation on factors that affect teaching and learning of chemistry in distance training programme at University of Rwanda–College of Education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Rwanda-College of Education.
  32. UNESCO. (2002). Open and distance learning: Trends, policy and strategy considerations. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128463
  33. UNESCO. (2014). Module 2: Statistics for educational planning. UNESCO-IIEP. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231219
  34. UR-CE. (2015). Official website of UR-CE. University of Rwanda-College of Education. www.ce.ur.ac.rw
  35. UR-CE. (2016). Statistics of students. University of Rwanda-College of Education. https://ur.ac.rw/documents/Facts%20and%20Figures-Final-2018B.pdf
  36. Walti, C. (2008). Implementing web-based portfolios and learning journals as learner support tools: A illustration. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance and online learning environments (pp. 157-168). BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
  37. Yunas, M. (2014). Dimensions of schools’ characteristics for promoting their internal efficiency. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(2), pp.51-61.https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss10.244