Review Article

A theoretical framework for understanding the effective educator: Defining characteristics, practices, and implications

Leonidas Gavrilas 1 * , Konstantinos T. Kotsis 1
More Detail
1 Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(1), 2026, e2602, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17678
Submitted: 10 February 2025, Published: 01 January 2026
OPEN ACCESS   152 Views   76 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Teacher effectiveness is central to contemporary educational discourse, with research indicating that effective educators enhance student achievement, deeper learning, and social-emotional growth. This paper presents a framework distinguishing the characteristics, pedagogical approaches, and professional development that define effective teaching. While capable educators exhibit subject-matter expertise and basic instructional competence, effective educators transform these competencies into measurable gains in student engagement, well-being, and achievement. The discussion highlights essential traits such as robust content knowledge, diverse instructional strategies, purposeful assessment, and the creation of positive learning environments. It also emphasizes stakeholder collaboration, reflective practice, and continuous professional growth. This paper underscores the critical distinction between mere capability and genuine effectiveness by situating educator effectiveness within a broader context of cognitive activation and a supportive climate. This distinction highlights the educator’s role in fostering problem-solving skills and lifelong learning. It advocates for ongoing research, professional development, and institutional support to empower educators in fostering meaningful student learning and long-term academic success.

CITATION (APA)

Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2026). A theoretical framework for understanding the effective educator: Defining characteristics, practices, and implications. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(1), e2602. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17678

REFERENCES

  1. AbdulRab, H. (2023). Teacher professional development in the 21st century. African Journal of Education and Practice, 9(4), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.2237
  2. Adams, D., Harris, A., & Jones, M. S. (2016). Teacher-parent collaboration for an inclusive classroom: Success for every child. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 58-71.
  3. Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
  4. Anderson-Butcher, D., Bates, S., Lawson, H. A., Childs, T. M., & Iachini, A. L. (2022). The community collaboration model for school improvement: A scoping review. Education Sciences, 12(12), Article 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120918
  5. Antinluoma, M., Ilomäki, L., & Toom, A. (2021). Practices of professional learning communities. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613
  6. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  7. Bardach, L., & Klassen, R. M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
  8. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
  9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  10. Bock, T., Thomm, E., Bauer, J., & Gold, B. (2024). Fostering student teachers’ research-based knowledge of effective feedback. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2338841
  11. Brown, G. T. L. (2022). The past, present and future of educational assessment: A transdisciplinary perspective. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633
  12. Brunetti, A., Büchel, K., Jakob, M., Jann, B., & Steffen, D. (2024). Inadequate teacher content knowledge and what could be done about it: Evidence from El Salvador. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 16(2), 206-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2023.2213681
  13. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548677
  14. Chiba, M., Sustarsic, M., Perriton, S., & Edwards, D. B. (2021). Investigating effective teaching and learning for sustainable development and global citizenship: Implications from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, Article 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102337
  15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
  16. DePetris, T., & Eames, C. (2017). A collaborative community education model: Developing effective school-community partnerships. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.26
  17. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  18. Díaz-Sacco, A., & Muñoz-Salinas, Y. (2024). Conditions and opportunities for teacher collaboration during the implementation of a professional development programme. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2405617
  19. Duckor, B., & Holmberg, C. L. (2023). Feedback for continuous improvement in the classroom: New perspectives, practices, and possibilities. Corwin Press.
  20. Duta, N., Tomoaica, E., & Panisoara, G. (2015). Desirable characteristics defining to describe an effective teacher. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1223-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.383
  21. Earthman, G. I. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Maryland.
  22. Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5
  23. Fischer, J., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2024). How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2206986
  24. Forsler, A., Nilsson, P., & Walan, S. (2024). Capturing and developing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in sustainable development using content representation and video-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 54(3), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10149-y
  25. Fox, J. (2016). Using portfolios for assessment/alternative assessment. In E. Shohamy, I. G. Or, & S. May (Eds.), Language testing and assessment (pp. 1-13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02326-7_9-1
  26. Fuentealba, C. (2011). The role of assessment in the student learning process. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(2), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.2.157
  27. Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Investigating perceptions of primary and preschool educators regarding incorporation of educational robotics into STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(1), Article ep24003. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14384
  28. Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025a). A theoretical framework for the effective STEM educator: Integrating literacy, knowledge, collaboration, and self-efficacy. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(4), Article em085. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/16857
  29. Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025b). Development and validation of a survey instrument towards attitude, knowledge, and application of educational robotics (AKAER). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 48(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2024.2358780
  30. Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025c). Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16538
  31. Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025d). Teachers as facilitators and innovators in 21st-century STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), Article ep25014. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17245
  32. Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2022). Attitudes and behaviors of university students towards electromagnetic radiation of cell phones and wireless networks. Aquademia, 6(2), Article ep22009. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/12393
  33. Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2024). Assessing teacher readiness for educational robotics integration in primary and preschool education. Education 3-13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2300699
  34. Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2025a). The challenges encountered by preschool and primary educators in implementing educational robotics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2578308
  35. Gavrilas, L., Papanikolaou, M.-S., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025b). Exploring electricity in early childhood education: A 5E-based learning approach. Science Activities, 62(1), 53–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2024.2406208
  36. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed). Teachers College.
  37. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 109(4), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401
  38. Gontas, P., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of renewable energy sources. Science and Technology Issues in Education. 14, 37-48.
  39. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  40. Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
  41. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school (unabridged.). Blackstone Audio.
  42. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480210376487
  43. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
  44. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  45. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Annual synthesis, 2002. National Center for Family & Community Connections with Schools.
  46. Hudson, C. (2024). A conceptual framework for understanding effective professional learning community (PLC) operation in schools. Journal of Education, 204(3), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574231197364
  47. Jabeen, R. (2020). Multicultural diverse classroom addressing the instructional challenges and reflections, from a teacher’s perspective. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512515
  48. Jabrouni, H., Kamsu-Foguem, B., Geneste, L., & Vaysse, C. (2011). Continuous improvement through knowledge-guided analysis in experience feedback. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(8), 1419-1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.02.015
  49. Jimaa, S. (2011). The impact of assessment on students learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 718-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.133
  50. Kaushik, A. (2021). Improving learning: Reconsidering student assessment globally. In S. Ra, S. Jagannathan, & R. Maclean (Eds.), Powering a learning society during an age of disruption (pp. 47-61). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0983-1_4
  51. Ko, J., & Sammons, P. (2013). Effective teaching: A review of research and evidence. CfBT Education Trust.
  52. Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272
  53. Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Optimal STEM educators for elementary school: Students from the primary education vs. Science department. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.360
  54. Kotsis, K. T., & Gavrilas, L. (2025). Review of scientific literacy of pre-service teachers on electromagnetic radiation. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(1).05
  55. Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1987.11075284
  56. Libman, Z. (2010). Alternative assessment in higher education: An experience in descriptive statistics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1-2), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.01.002
  57. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  58. Lohr, A., Sailer, M., Stadler, M., & Fischer, F. (2024). Digital learning in schools: Which skills do teachers need, and who should bring their own devices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, Article 104788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104788
  59. Lupascu, A. R., Pânisoară, G., & Pânisoară, I.-O. (2014). Characteristics of effective teacher. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 534-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.305
  60. Marvi, K. (2023). Impact of cultural diversity in classrooms of secondary schools. Creative Education, 14(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.141014
  61. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  62. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  63. Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), Article e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
  64. Moses, G., Ingham, B., Barnicle, K., Blanchard, J., Cheetham, J., Courter, S., DeVos, E., Immendorf, M., Litzkow, M., Svarovsky, G., & Wolf, A. (2006). Effective teaching with technology. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 7-11). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322286
  65. Ovati, T. S. R., Rydland, V., Grøver, V., & Lekhal, R. (2024). Teacher perceptions of parent collaboration in multi-ethnic ECEC settings. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1340295
  66. Papanikolaou, M.-S., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Enhancing pre-school students’ understanding of water pollution through educational intervention. In G. Stylos, & K. T. Kotsis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Panhellenic Conference on Education in Natural Sciences and Technology. https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.5570
  67. Papanikolaou, M.-S., Plakitsi, K., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Investigating preschool students’ ideas for science concepts on understanding modern environmental problems. In Proceedings of the 12th Panhellenic Conference on the Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education: “The Role of Science Education in 21st Century Society”. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33312.15369
  68. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
  69. Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), Article 1522781. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781
  70. Pozas, M., & Letzel-Alt, V. (2023). Teacher collaboration, inclusive education and differentiated instruction: A matter of exchange, co-construction, or synchronization? Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2240941. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2240941
  71. Prasad Bhatt, S. (2021). Self-directed professional development: Efl teachers’ understanding. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(4), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i4.737
  72. Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Van der Schaaf, M. F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Bok, H. G. J. (2023). Between theory and practice: Educators’ perceptions on assessment quality criteria and its impact on student learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213
  73. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  74. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching:foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  75. Spinthourakis, J. A., Lalor, J., & Berg, W. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural diversity in the classroom. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93494-5
  76. Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment through the student’s eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22-26.
  77. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  78. Teig, N., Nilsen, T., & Yang Hansen, K. (Eds.). (2024). Effective and equitable teacher practice in mathematics and science education: A Nordic perspective across time and groups of students (v. 14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49580-9
  79. Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., Huang, Y., Western, M., McCourt, B., & McCarthy, I. (2022). The impact of effective teaching practices on academic achievement when mediated by student engagement: Evidence from Australian high schools. Education Sciences, 12(5), Article 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050358
  80. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  81. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
  82. Vieluf, S., & Klieme, E. (2023). Teaching effectiveness revisited through the lens of practice theories. In A.-K. Praetorius, & C. Y. Charalambous (Eds.), Theorizing teaching: Current status and open issues (pp. 57-95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25613-4_3
  83. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  84. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2008). Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.