Review Article

A bibliometric analysis of realistic mathematics education research (2000-2025): Global trends and development

Da Tien Nguyen 1 * , Linh Phuong Tran 1 , Linh Hien Tran Vu 1 , An Thu Nguyen 1 , Tu Minh Nguyen 1 , Quynh Phuong Nguyen 1
More Detail
1 Faculty of Education, Hanoi Metropolitan University, Hanoi, VIETNAM* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(2), 2026, e2617, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/19570
Submitted: 04 November 2025, Published: 11 October 2026
OPEN ACCESS   13 Views   4 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of realistic mathematics education (RME) research from 2000 to 2025, focusing on global trends and development. Employing VOSviewer and CiteSpace, we analyzed a dataset of publications related to RME. Our analysis explores key themes, influential authors, prominent countries, and the evolution of research topics within the RME field. The findings reveal significant growth in RME research globally, with a shift towards diverse applications and adaptations of the RME approach. We identify influential clusters of research focusing on areas such as curriculum development, teacher education, technology integration, and specific mathematical domains like geometry and algebra. The study also highlights the emergence of new research areas, including the integration of digital tools and the exploration of RME’s impact on diverse learner populations. Furthermore, we examine the collaborative networks between researchers and institutions, identifying key players and collaborative patterns across different countries. This analysis provides valuable insights for researchers, educators, and policymakers interested in understanding the current state and future directions of RME research, ultimately contributing to the advancement of mathematics education globally.
Keywords: realistic mathematics education, mathematics education, bibliometric analysis, global trends, development trends

CITATION (APA)

Nguyen, D. T., Tran, L. P., Tran Vu, L. H., Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, T. M., & Nguyen, Q. P. (2026). A bibliometric analysis of realistic mathematics education research (2000-2025): Global trends and development. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 8(2), e2617. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/19570

REFERENCES

  1. Ariati, V., Anzani, V., Juandi, D., & Hasanah, A. (2022). Meta-analysis study: Effect of realistic mathematics education approach on student’s mathematical literacy ability. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 2953-2964. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.6182
  2. Azmi, A. L., Wardono, W., & Cahyono, A. N. (2018). Mathematics literacy on creative problem solving with realistic mathematics education approach assisted by e-learning schoology (in Indonesian). Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(3), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v7i3.24472
  3. Bosica, J., Pyper, J. S., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics preservice teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, Article 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335
  4. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2015). Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: A 21st century learning perspective on realistic mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7
  5. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
  6. Çilingir Altıner, E. (2021). Gerçekçi matematik eğitimi üzerine bir kuramsal çalışma [A theoretical study on realistic mathematics education]. Eğitim ve Teknoloji, 3(1), 48-73.
  7. Dewantara, A. H., Setiawati, F. A., & Saraswati, S. (2023). Towards numeracy literacy development: A single-case study on the use of the living book homeschooling model. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p225-242
  8. Diponegoro, A. M., Khalil, I. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2024). When religion meets mathematics: From mathematical anxiety to mathematical well-being for minority group student. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 413-440. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p413-440
  9. Dissanayake, H., Iddagoda, A., & Popescu, C. (2022). Entrepreneurial education at universities: A bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), Article 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040185
  10. Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2018). Climate change and tourism: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310
  11. Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Y., Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., Sumarwati, S., Hafizatunnisa, H., & Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316
  12. Fauzana, R., Dahlan, J. A., & Jupri, A. (2020). The influence of realistic mathematics education (RME) approach in enhancing students’ mathematical literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, Article 032025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032052
  13. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Springer.
  14. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Springer.
  15. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
  16. Ginting, M. S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Isa, M., & Murni, M. (2018). Improving the reasoning ability of elementary school student through the Indonesian realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54
  17. Indrastoto, I. E., & Mahmudi, A. (2025). Meta-analysis of the effect of RME on students’ critical thinking skills. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 7(4), 1725-1741. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v7i4.10165
  18. Johnson, E. M., & Larsen, S. P. (2012). Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.07.003
  19. Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. H. M. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481-2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
  20. Ke, F. (2019). Mathematical problem solving and learning in an architecture-themed epistemic game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1085-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09643-2
  21. Kusuma, B. J., Wardono, W., & Winarti, E. R. (2016). Kemampuan literasi matematika peserta didik pada pembelajaran realistik berbantuan Edmodo [The mathematical literacy skills of eighth grade students in realistic learning supported by Edmodo]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v5i3.12015
  22. Lady, A., Utomo, B. T., & Chikita, L. (2018). Improving mathematical ability and student learning outcomes through realistic mathematic education (RME) approach. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 55-57. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.10.10954
  23. Larsen, S. P. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the group and isomorphism concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 712-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.006
  24. Larsen, S., & Zandieh, M. (2008). Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9106-0
  25. Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
  26. Listiawati, N., Sabon, S. S., Wibowo, S., & Riyanto, B. (2023). Analysis of implementing realistic mathematics education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700
  27. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
  28. Palinussa, A. L., Tupamahu, P. Z., Sabandar, V. P., Makaruku, Y. H., & Sabandar, J. (2025). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematics e-modules in improving student learning outcomes. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p45-64
  29. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4
  30. Phan, T. T., Do, T. T., Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Do, B. C., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education in Scopus database between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133-1149. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1133
  31. Rasmussen, C., & Blumenfeld, H. (2007). Reinventing solutions to systems of linear differential equations: A case of emergent models involving analytic expressions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.09.004
  32. Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.001
  33. Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388-420. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034860
  34. Rasmussen, C., Kwon, O. N., Allen, K., Marrongelle, K., & Burtch, M. (2006). Capitalizing on advances in mathematics and K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: An inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036787
  35. Sawatzki, C. (2017). Lessons in financial literacy task design: Authentic, imaginable, useful. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0184-0
  36. Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2018). Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: A case of modeling-based teacher education courses. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0898-9
  37. Shoffa, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of realistic mathematics education approaches on students’ critical thinking abilities. Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 4(2), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v4i2.571
  38. Stephan, M., & Akyuz, D. (2012). A proposed instructional theory for integer addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 428-464. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0428
  39. Sudi, W., Jafar, J., Kadir, K., & Salim, S. (2022). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics instruction approach on students’ mathematical literacy. Jurnal Amal Pendidikan, 3(2), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.36709/japend.v3i2.28874
  40. Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
  41. Susanta, Sumardi, H., Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Mathematics literacy task on number pattern using Bengkulu context for junior high school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp85-102
  42. Sutisna, P., Budi, A. S., & Noornia, A. (2018). The influence of the realistic mathematics education approach and early mathematical ability to mathematical literacy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Current Research, 6(4), 798-801. https://doi.org/10.14741/ijmcr/v.6.4.18
  43. Swinyard, C. (2011). Reinventing the formal definition of limit: The case of Amy and Mike. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.001
  44. Şengül, S., Kaba, Y., & Ayvali, İ. (2017). The effect of realistic mathematics education on 6th grade students’ skills of using operational estimation strategies for verbal estimation problems. In Proceedings of the Global Conference on Education and Research (pp. 452-462).
  45. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
  46. Treffers, A. (1993). Wiskobas and Freudenthal realistic mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274104
  47. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
  48. Van Zanten, M., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2021). Mathematics curriculum reform and its implementation in textbooks: Early addition and subtraction in realistic mathematics education. Mathematics, 9(7), Article 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070752
  49. Voigt, M., Fredriksen, H., & Rasmussen, C. (2020). Leveraging the design heuristics of realistic mathematics education and culturally responsive pedagogy to create a richer flipped classroom calculus curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1051-1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01124-x
  50. Wahyuni Ningsi, S., Kadir, K., & Rahmat, R. (2022). The influence of realistic mathematics education approach on mathematical literacy skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Amal Pendidikan, 3(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.36709/japend.v3i1.25271
  51. Yilmaz, R. (2020). Prospective mathematics teachers’ cognitive competencies on realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 17-44. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.8690.17-44
  52. Zandieh, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2010). Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.01.001
  53. Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4(7), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A1001