Research Article

Linking cutting-edge scientific content and educator professional development: A collaborative approach to supporting science teachers

Udita Gupta 1 * , Melissa M. Goldsmith 1 , Mary D. Burbank 1 , Sarah Buening 2
More Detail
1 Urban Institute for Teacher Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA2 The Daily Utah Chronicle, Salt Lake City, UT, USA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 7(2), July 2025, e2518, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17479
Submitted: 25 November 2024, Published: 02 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS   62 Views   30 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Effective professional development plays a crucial role in teacher growth, retention, and mitigating factors leading to teacher burnout. This paper explores the impact of a professional development opportunity that resulted from a cross-disciplinary collaboration between school districts and two entities at a western university in the USA. The professional development opportunity outlined in this paper connected middle and school science teachers to a local and timely scientific concept, engaged them with interactive workshops, and provided them with all the necessary resources (e.g., lesson plans and related instructional materials) needed to implement content and pedagogy in teachers’ classrooms. Program evaluation results indicated a high level of satisfaction from participants regarding course content, activities, and resources.

CITATION (APA)

Gupta, U., Goldsmith, M. M., Burbank, M. D., & Buening, S. (2025). Linking cutting-edge scientific content and educator professional development: A collaborative approach to supporting science teachers. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 7(2), e2518. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17479

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  3. Binkhorst, F., Poortman, C. L., McKeeney, S., & van Joolingen, W. (2022). Leadership in teacher design teams for professional development: Research synthesis and applications for coaches. Irish Educational Studies, 43(4), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2148264
  4. Birman, B. V. S., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.
  5. Copley. (2013). Geothermal energy focused on education campaign. SNL Energy Power Daily.
  6. Croft, M., Guffy, G., & Vitale, D. (2018). Encouraging more high school students to consider teaching. ACT Policy Research.
  7. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
  8. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
  9. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  10. Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shemwell, J. T., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Shavelson, R. J., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 360–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347852
  11. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  12. Guskey, T. R. (1994). Results-oriented professional development: In search of an optimal mix of effective practices. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 42–50.
  13. Guskey, T. R. (1997). Research needs to link professional development and student learning. Journal of Staff Development, 18(2), 36–40.
  14. Guskey, T. R. (1999). Moving from means to ends. Journal of Staff Development, 20(2), Article 48.
  15. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  16. Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
  17. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. A. T. (2003). Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 495–538. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002495
  18. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
  19. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307
  20. Luft, J. A., Firestone, J. B., Wong, S. S., Ortega, I., Adams, K., & Bang, E. (2011). Beginning secondary science teacher induction: A two-year mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1199–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20444
  21. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  22. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
  23. Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  24. Ottoson, J. M. (1997). After the applause: Exploring multiple influences on application following an adult education program. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704700203
  25. Richman, L. J., Haines, S., & Fello, S. (2019). Collaborative professional development focused on promoting effective implementation of the next generation science standards. Science Education International, 30(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.6
  26. Roeser, R. W., Skinner, E., Beers, J., & Jennings, P. A. (2012). Mindfulness training and teachers’ professional development: An emerging area of research and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00238.x
  27. Sparks, D. (1994). A paradigm shift in staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 26–29.
  28. Sparks, D. (1995). Focusing staff development on improving student learning. In G. Cawelti (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving student achievement (pp. 163–169). Educational Research Service.
  29. Suters, L., A. (2004). An exploratory study of the impact of an inquiry-based professional development course on the beliefs and instructional practices of urban inservice teachers [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee].
  30. Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003
  31. Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010
  32. Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2